Covert Attacks on Women’s Rights

Something I actually managed to miss whilst my computer–and hence brain, soul and entire being–was rendered useless this week was the announcement of a bill into parliament called the “Unborn Victims of Violence” act. Just like the abomination of a Supreme Court decision that got passed in the US last year, this strategy isn’t about what it says it’s about–it’s about laying the groundwork, in a legal system based on precedent, for enshrining a definition of fetus as life into law, and from there figuring out how to undermine the Morgentaler decision.

The vote is probably going to be on March 5, so on the off chance that I have a reader or two who hasn’t yet done so, there’s a handy-dandy auto-email generator for sending a request to Mr. Stéphane Dion asking him to whip the Liberals on this one over here. (It’s a private member’s bill, and the assumption is that the Conservatives are a lost cause, while the NDP and the Bloc are already on board).

I find it most sickening to see this kind of strategy being conflated with the horrifying statistics of violence against women during pregnancy. The most common cause of death of pregnant women in Canada (among other places) is homicide. There seems to be an increase in the severity of abuse during pregnancy, and one could speculate until blue in the face about the basis for this (hint: use some variation on the framework that the pregnancy represents a loss of some level of control over the abuser’s partner). It is most certainly not, however, connected to abusers’ higher level hatred of babies, nor is it the kind of violence that has ever been affected by the thought of deterrent punishment.

I hate it when they take reality and try to use it against us.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Covert Attacks on Women’s Rights

  1. matttbastard says:

    Ken Epp, the Alberta MP who introduced the bill, showed up in comments @ Kuri’s place to lamely defend his precious little bill.

    “Disingenuous” doesn’t begin to describe his remarks.

  2. purtek says:

    Holy shit.

    That begins to describe his remarks. I left a long comment there. I’m sure it will do nothing but make me angrier and further lessen the standard distance between my jaw and the floor, but thanks for the tip.

  3. BetaCandy says:

    These bills are insane.

    The homicides of pregnant women generally occur because someone wants rid of the unborn baby, or they’re punishing her for having it (which amounts to roughly the same atrocity). If the punishment for one murder here in the US – which can be capital punishment – doesn’t deter them, I don’t think a tack-on second homicide charge is going to help. The problem is that these killers are extremely motivated. That baby entering the world is scarier than any stick you could wave at them.

    I don’t see a “solution” short of removing the concepts of monogamy and tiered class economics, so men would no longer have financial reasons (can’t afford a baby) or relationship reasons (oops! got girlfriend pregnant, wife might notice) to want to get rid of a baby before its existence is known.

  4. Wanker(s) of the Day (One Body. One person. One count.)

    by matttbastard
    The Braintrust @ the Ottawa Citizen (h/t Fern Hill @ BnR)
    Miss Vicky nails it in a diplomatic, sympathetic-yet-uncompromising  fashion:
    My heart breaks for families of murdered pregnant women – people like Mary Talbot, who wrote a piec…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s